A6000 sigma 30mm 1.412/21/2023 ![]() ![]() And you have to define the source with “Source: ” (working link). You cannot copy more than 20 words from any of our posts. Here is the definition of the word “rumor” according to Merriam Webster dictionary:Įtymology: Middle English rumour, from Anglo-French, from Latin rumor clamor, gossip akin to Old English rēon to lament, Sanskrit rauti he roarsġ: talk or opinion widely disseminated with no discernible sourceĢ: a statement or report current without known authority for its truthģ archaic : talk or report of a notable person or eventĬontent Copyright If you want to use any image from this website you have to ask for permission. All trademarks and brands belong to their respective owners. Please visit their official websites by typing the specific brand name and adding. F1.4 made it big that they wouldn't fit OSS.Disclaimer: SonyAlphaRumors has no affiliation with any of the equipment manufacturers mentioned on this site. A FAST, VERSATILE PRIME, this 30mm f/1.4 DC DN Contemporary Lens from Sigma is designed for APS-C-format Sony E-mount mirrorless cameras, where it provides a 45mm equivalent focal length. I would buy this lens, if sigma made it f/1.8 with OSS and similar size, while sharper and cheaper than Sony. With sigma 1/50 1/60 is your minimum speed you can handheld with a lot of risk. Sony will give a better picture when:ġ/15 f/1.8 vs. I just upgraded to a7iii, otherwise would’ve also wanted the 16mm and 56mm - the sigma trio. Man, I traded my sigma 30mm for the 16mm, and I regretted, I still like the 16 but the 30nis so much versatile. Because it's possible to take a sharper picture with Sony in low light handheld. Thanks Sigma lenses really give a new breathing to the a6000 imo. Sony lens deserves to be mentioned better about these 2 points. I carry around my a6300 because it's small. So, Sony 35mm managed to fit OSS in a smaller package than sigma (f/1.8 respectingly) makes a great deal of difference for us. ![]() On my a7rii I wouldn't ever place neither of these two anyway for different reasons. ![]() This is Apsc lens, and Sony does not provide in body stabilization for its Apsc line. However, Sigma also offers a Micro Four Thirds System version if you are not shooting Sony. However, I read it entirely, and DPreview should have been a little more fair here. The Sigma 16mm f/1.4 DC DN Lens and 30mm f/1.4 DC DN Lenses are specifically designed for the Sony E-Mount APS-C crop factor cameras like the Sony A6500, A6400, and A6000 for example. The question is, does the extra weight and lack of OSS keep it from topping the Sony as the ideal 'normal' for APS-C E-mount shooters? ![]() While heavier and much bigger, it is less expensive and brighter than the Sony 35 F1.8. The long barrel of the Sigma, and even longer overall dimensions do make it quite large in comparison to APS-C Sony Alpha cameras, but the weight isn't entirely off-balance. The only downfall in terms of build is the Sigma's lens hood, which doesn't seem to confidently click in to place, and is made of rather fragile feeling plastic. The rubber grip turns smoothly and easily with minimal effort, making the Sony feel a bit stiff. The focus ring is also an improvement, and a step above the Sony. Compared to older Sigma DN lenses, the 30mm F1.4 doesn't let its focus elements rattle about when unmounted, which is a very welcome change. They both use a machined metal chassis with plastic internals. The difference between them doesn't suddenly open one up to a type of photography that couldn't be achieved with the other.īuild quality between the Sigma and the Sony is fairly similar. In stills terms, though, there's little real-world difference between the Sigma's 45mm equivalent view and the 52.5mm equivalent of the Sony. That alone gives it a better chance at being the preferred lens for video, although when shooting 4K the slightly wider FOV of the Sigma might fare better on any body that gives an additional crop. First, while the Sony is 2/3 of a stop slower than the Sigma, it does include optical image stabilization. In terms of just spec we see a couple of major differences. 1 aspherical and 1 double-sided aspherical ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |